In making
a curriculum we have to determine the goals and outcomes of a program to
1.
Motivate the students / learners
2.
Improve the effectiveness and efficiercy of
teaching and learning
3.
Make the program / curriculum effective and efficient
In
deciding goals we have to consider the nature of arms : that is
1.
Value
2.
knowledge
3.
shill
Quesstions
arise in planning curriculum goals are :
1.
Is there any value in teaching students a
foreign lauguage?
2.
Should only practical life skills be applied in
the teaching?
3.
Should only the teacher participale in planning
goals?
4.
Should the learners study the litevature and
culture of the foreign language
or just learn to speak and use the language as a tool ?
5.
Is the learning foreign language
connected to the social injustices ?
6.
Should the teachers just prepare the students to pass a
language exam or together with students seek ways of find good methods of
assessment ?
7.
Should the teacher give role to the natine speaker in the
curriculum?
Eisner
(1992 – p.302) Educational practice is concerned with the achievement and
value. Also before designing goals,
consider five curriculum ideologies
Ideology
stresses / emphasires that curriculum planners consider the understanding both
of present and long term needs of learnens and society.
1.
Academic
Rationalism
Clark
(1987.p.5) Academic rationalism is sometimes used to justily the inclusion of
certaim foreign language in school curricula, where they are taught not only just as tools for communication but also as an aspect of social studies.
2. Learness-centeredness
Reconceptualists emphasize the role of experience in learning .
Contructivists emphasize that learning involves
active construction and testing of one’s own representation of the world and
accommodation of it to one’s personal
conceptual framework.
Social reconstructionism
This
curriculum perspective emphasizes the roles schools and learners can and should
play in addressing social injustices and inequality.
Curriculum development is not seen as
a neutral process. School likewise do not present equal opportunities for all
(freire 1972; Apple 1986) but reflect the general in equalities in society.
School must engage teachers and
personal problem and seek ways to address them.
This process is known ”empowerment” Teachers must empower their
students so that they can recognize unjust system of class, race, or gender, and challenge them.
One of the best-known pedagogues is
Freire (1972). Who argued that teachers and learners are involved in a join
process of exploring and constructing knowledge.
Students are not the “object” of
knowledge: they must find ways of recognizing and resisting various forms of
control.
Cultural pluralism.
This philosophy argues that schools
should prepare students to participate in several different cultural and not
merely the culture of dominant social and economic group.
Cultural pluralism seeks to redress racism to raise them
self-esteem of minority groups, and to help children appreciate the view point
of others cultures and religion.
Stating curriculum outcomes
Aims.
In curriculum discussions, the term
goal and aim are used interchangeably to refer to a description of the general
purposes of curriculum and objective to refer to more specific and concrete
description of purpose. We will use the term aim and objective here.
The purposes of aim statements are:
-
To
provide a clear definition of purposes of program
-
To
provide guidelines for teachers, learners, and materials writes.
-
To
help provide a focus for instruction
-
To
describe important and realizable changes in learning.
The following are example of aim
statements from different kinds of language programs.
A business English course.
-
To
develop basic communication skills needed to answer
-
To
learn how to participate in casual conversation with other employees in
workplace
-
To
learn how to write effective business letters
A course for hotel employees
-
To
develop the communication skills needed to answer telephone calls in hotel
-
To
deal with guest inquiries nd complaints
-
To
explain and clarify charges on guest’s bill
Aim
statements are generally derived from information gathered during a need
analys.
The
following areas of difficulty were some of those identified for non English
background students studying in English medium universities.
-
Understanding
lectures
-
Participating
in seminars
-
Taking
notes during lecture
-
Reading
at adequate speed to be able to complete reading assignments
-
Presenting
ideas and information in an organized way in a written assignment.
In developing course aims objectives
from this information, each areas of difficulty will have to be examined and
researched in order to understand what is involved in understanding lecture,
participating in seminars, and so on. What knowledge and skills does each
activity imply? Normally aims of a short course can be describe in two or three
aim statements:
However, in a course spanning a
longer time period, such as the primary school course referred to earlier, a
greater number of aim statements will be needed.
For these to become aims, they need
to focus on the changes in the letters that will result:
Student s will learn how to write
effective business letters for use in the hotel and tourism industries.
Students will learn how to listen
effectively in conversational interactions and how to develop better listening
strategies.
Students will learn how to
communicate information and ideas creatively and effectively through writing
Students will be able to communicate
in English at a basic level for purpose of tourism.
Objectives.
Aims are very general statements of
the goals of program. They can be interpreted in many different ways.
For example, consider the following
aim statements:
Students will learn how to write
effective business letters for use in the hotel and tourism industries.
Although this provides a clear
description of the focus of a program, it does not describe the kinds of
business letters students will learn or clarify what is meant by effective
business letters.
These are known as objectives (They
are also sometimes referred to as instructional objectives).
An objective refers to a statement of
specific changes a program seeks to bring about and result from an analysis of
the aim into its different components. Objectives generally have the following
characteristics:
-
They
describe what the aim seeks to achieve in term of smaller units of learning
-
They
provide a basis for the organization of teaching activities.
-
They
describe learning in terms of observable behavior or performance.
The advantages of describing the aims
of a course in terms of objectives are :
-
They
facilitate planning : once objectives have been agreed on, course planning,
materials preparation, textbook selection, and related processes can begin.
-
They
provide measurable outcomes and thus provide accountability:
Given a set of objectives, the
success or failure of a program to teach the objectives can be measured.
-
They
are prescriptive: they describe how planning should proceed an do away with
subjective interpretations and personal opinions.
Aims and objectives such as the
following can be described (brown 1995)
Aim.
Students will learn how to understand
lectures given in English.
Objectives
Aims are
very general statements of the goal of a program. They can be interpreted in
many different ways.
For example,
consider the following aim statements:
Students will learn how to write
effective business letters for use in the hotel and tourism industries.
Although
this provides a clear description of the focus of a program, it does not
describe the kinds of business letters students will learn or clarify what is
meant by effective business letters.
Objectives are more specific to describe the goal of a
program . Objectives are statements to
give a more precise f ocus to the
program. Objectives are also sometimes
referred to as instructional objectives or teaching objectives.
An objective
refers to statement of specific changes a program seeks to bring about and
results from an analysis of the aim into its different components.
Objectives
generally have the following characteristics:
1.
They
describe what the aim seeks to achieve
in terms of smaller units of learning.
2.
They
provide a basis for the organization of teaching activities.
3.
They
describe learning in terms of observable behavior or performance.
The
advantages of describing the aims of the course in terms of objectives are :
1.
They
facilitate planning : once objectives have been agreed on, course planning,
materials preparation, textbook selection, and related processes can begin.
2.
They
provide measurable outcomes and thus provide accountability: given a set of
objectives, the success or failure of a program to teach the objectives can be
measured.
3.
They
are prescriptive : They describe how planning should proceed and do away with
subjective interpretations and personal opinions.
In relation
to the activity of “understanding lectures” referred to above, for example,
aims and objectives such as the following can be described (brown 1995) :
Aim
·
Students
will learn how to understand lectures given in English.
Objectives
·
Student
will be able to follow an argument, theme, or thesis of a lecture.
·
Students
will learn how to recognize the following aspects of lecture:
Cause-and-effect relationship
Comparisons and contrasts
Premises used in persuasive arguments
Supporting details used in persuasive
arguments
Statements
of objectives have the following characteristics :
1.
Objectives
describe a learning outcome.
In writing objectives, expressions
like will study, will learn about, will prepare students for are avoided
because they do not describe the result of learning but rather what students
will do during a course. Objectives can be described with phrases like will
have, will learn how to, will be able to.
2.
Objectives
should be consistent with the curriculum aim.
Only objectives that clearly serve to
realize an aim should be included.
For example, an objective below is
unrelated to the curriculum aim.
Aim : Students will learn how to
write effective business letters for use in the hotel and tourism industries.
Objectives : The student can
understand and respond to simple question over the telephone.
Because the aim relates to writing
business letters, an objective in the domain of telephone skill is not
consistent with this aim. Either the aim statement should be revised to allow for this objective or the objective
should not be included.
3.
Objective
should be precise.
Objective that are vague and
ambiguous are not useful. This seen in following objectives for conversation
course :
Student will know how to use useful
conversation expressions.
A more precise objective would be :
Students will use conversation
expression for greeting people, opening and closing conversations.
4.
Objectives
should be feasible :
Objective should describe outcome
that are attainable in the time available during a course. The following
objective is probably not attainable in a 60-hour English course:
Student will be able to follow
conversations spoken by native speakers.
The following is a more feasible
objective :
Students will be able to get the gist
of short conversation in simple English on topics related to daily life
leisure.
Frankel
(1983, 124) gives example of aims and objectives for a course in foundation
reading skills for first-year university students in a Thai university :
Aim : To read authentic, nonspecialist, nonfiction
texts in English with comprehension and at reasonable speed.
Objectives :
1.
To
use linguistic information in the text as clues to meaning, including :
·
deducing
the meaning and use of unfamiliar lexical items through an understanding of
word formation and context clues.
·
Decoding
complex phrases and sentences including premodification, postmodification,
complex embedding, and clause relations in compound and complex sentences.
·
Recognizing
and interpreting formal cohesive devices for linking different parts of a text.
·
Recognizing
and interpreting discourse markers
2.
To
understand the communicative value of a text, including :
·
Its
overall rhetorical purpose (e.g. giving instructions, reporting an event).
·
Its
rhetorical structure, including ways of initiating, developing, and terminating
a discourse.
3.
To
read for information, including :
·
Identifying
the topic (theme).
·
Identifying
the main ideas, stated and implied.
·
Distinguishing
between the topic and the main idea.
·
Reading
for detail.
·
Distinguishing
important from unimportant details.
·
Skimming
to obtain the gist or a general impression of the semantic content.
·
Scanning
to locate specifically required information.
4.
To
read interpretatively including :
·
Extracting
information no explicitly stated by making inferences
·
Distinguishing
fact from opinion.
·
Interpreting
the writer’s intention, attitude, and
bias.
·
Making
critical judgments.
The difficulty of drawing up statements of objectives should
not be underestimated. In developing language objectives one is doing more than
creating a wish list off the top of one’s head.
Sound objectives in language teaching are based on an
understanding of nature of the matter being taught (e.g. listening, speaking,
reading, writing), an awareness of
learning for basic, intermediate, or advanced-level learners, and ability to be
able to describe course aims in terms of logical and well-structured units of
organization.
In developing objectives it is necessary to make use of a
variety o sources, such as diagnostic information concerning student’s learning
difficulties, description of skilled performance in different language domains,
information about different language level
as well as characterization of the skill involved in different domains
of language use.
Objectives cannot therefore be regarded as fixed. As
instruction proceed, some may have to be revised, some dropped because they are
unrealistic, and others added to address gaps.
Competency-based
program outcomes
An alternative to the use of objectives in program planning
is to the describe learning outcomes in terms of competencies, an approach
associated with Competency-Based Language Teaching (CLBT). CLBT seeks to make a
focus on the outcomes of learning a central planning stage in the development
of language programs (Schneck 1978; Grognet and Crandall 1982). Traditionally,
in language teaching planners have focused to a large extent on the content of
teaching (as reflected in a concern for different types of syllabuses) or on
the process of teaching (as reflected in concern for different types of
teaching methods). Critics of this approach argue that this concern with
content or process focuses on the means of learning rather then its ends. CLBT
shifts the focus to the ends of learning rather than means. As a general
educational and training approach, CBLT seeks to improve accountability in
teaching trough linking instructions to measurable outcomes and performance
standards.
The characteristics of CBLT are described by Schneck (1978,
vi):
Competency-based education as much in common with such
approaches to learning as performance-based instruction, mastery learning and
individualized instruction. It is outcome-based and is adaptive to the changing
needs of students, teachers and the community.... Competencies differ from
other student goals and objectives in that they describe the student’s ability
to apply basic and other skills in the situations that are commonly encountered
in everyday life. Thus CBE is based on a set of outcomes that are derived from
an analysis of tasks typically required of students in life role situations.
THE NATURE OF
COMPETENCIES
Competencies refer to observable behaviors that are necessary
for the successful completion of real – world activities. These activities may
be related to any domain of life, though they have typically been linked to the
field of work and to social survival in a new environment. Docking (1994, 11)
points out the relationship between competencies and job performance:
A qualification or a job can be described as a collection of
units of competency, each of which is composed of a number of elements of
competency. A unit of competency might be a task, a role, a function, or a
learning module. These will change over time, and will vary from context to
context. An element of competency can be defined as any attribute of an
individual that contributes to successful performance of a task, job, function,
or activity in academic setting and/or a work setting. The includes specific
knowledge, thinking, processes, attitudes, and perceptual and physical skills.
Nothing is excluded that can be shown to contribute to performance. An element
of competency has meaning independent of context and time. It is the building
block for competency specifications for education, training, assessment,
qualifications, tasks, and jobs.
In the Australian Migrant Education Program, one the world’s
largest providers of language training to immigrants, a competency-based
approach is used. Learning outcomes are specified in terms of work-related
competencies such as the following:
Job-Seeking Skills: sample competencies
·
Can inquire about
an employment opportunity
·
Can read and
interpret advertisement for employment
·
Can prepare a
job-application letter
Workplace language: sample competencies
·
Can follow and
give oral instructions relevant to the workplace
·
Can read
diagrammatic and graphic workplace texts
·
Can write formal
letters relevant to a workplace context
In the Australian program competencies are described in terms
of:
·
Elements that’s
break down the competency into smaller components and refer to the essential
linguistic features involved.
·
Performance
criteria that specify the minimal performance required to achieve a competency.
·
Range of
variables that sets limits for the performance of the competency.
·
Sample texts and
assessment tasks the provide examples of texts and assessment tasks that relate
to the competency.
CRITICISMS OF THE USE
COMPETENCIES
CLBT is based on a social and economic efficiency model of
curriculum design that seeks to enable learners to participate effectively in
society. Consequently, as Tollefson and others have pointed out, the
competencies selected as a basis for instruction typically represent value
judgment about what such participation involves. Tollefson gives examples of
value-based competency descriptions developed as part of a refugee resettlement
training program in the Philippines:
·
To develop the
belief “that self-sufficiency is highly regarded in American society, that
upward mobility is possible by hard work and perseverance ...and the men and
the woman have equal access to employment opportunities”
·
To discourage
attending school while receiving welfare.
·
To develop the
attitude that the purchasing and use of secondhand items is appropriate.
·
To identify
common entry-level jobs that can be held by those with limited English ability.
·
To respond
appropriately to supervisors’ comments about quality of work on the job,
including mistake, working too slowly, and incomplete work.
(Tollefson 1986, 655-656)
Tollefson (1986, 656-657) points out that such competencies
encourage refugees “to consider themselves fortunate to find minimum-wage
employment, regardless of their previous education. Moreover, the competencies
attempt to inculcate attitudes and values that will make refugees passive
citizens who comply rather than complain, accept rather than resist, and
apologise rather than disagree.”
Criticisms such as these essentially argue for a different
curriculum ideology that CBLT, such as a learned-centered or
social-reconstructionist model. CBLT is not necessarily linked to the ideology
Tollefson exposes. A with the use of objectives, appropriately described and
chosen competency descriptions can provide a useful framework for course
planning and delivery, though they may be more appropriate for certain types of
courses that others. They seem particularly suited to programs that seek to
teach learners the skills needed to perform specific tasks and operations, as
found in many kinds of ESP programs.
THE STANDARDS MOVEMENT
The most recent realization of a competency perspective in
the United States is seen in the “standards” movement, which as dominated
educational discussions since the 1990s. As Glaser and Linn note:
In the recounting of our nation’s drive towards educational
reform, the last decade of this century will undoubtedly be recognized as the
time when a concerted press for national educational standards emerged. The
press for standards was evidenced by the efforts of federal and state legislators,
presidential and gubernatorial candidates, teacher and subject-matter
specialists, councils, governmental agencies, and private foundations. (Glaser
and Linn 1993, xiii)
Standards are descriptions of the targets students should be
able to reach in different domains of curriculum content, and throughout the
1990s there was a drive to specify standards for subject matter across the
curriculum. These standards or benchmarks are stated in the form of
competencies. In Australia, McKay (1999, 52) reports:
Literacy benchmarks at Years 3, 5 and 7 are currently under
development centrally in consultation with States/Territories, literacy experts
and professional associations. The benchmarks are to be short statements and to
be “expressed in plain, accessible English, clearly understandable by a
community audience”.... They are to be accompanied by professionals to assess
and report student progress against the benchmarks.”
Second and foreign language teaching in the United States has
also embraced the standards movement. “it quickly became apparent to ESL
educators in the United States at that time (1991) that the students we serve
were not being included in the standards-setting movement that was sweeping the
country”
Non language outcomes and process objectives
A language
curriculum typically includes other kinds of outcomes apart from
language-related objectives of the kind described above. If the curriculum
seeks to reflect values related to learner centeredness, social
reconstructionism or cultural pluralism, outcomes related to these values will
also need to be included. Jackson reports that a group of teachers of adults
immigrants in Australia identified eight broad categories of non language
outcomes in their teaching learning ( Jackson 1993, 2):
·
Social,
psychological, and emotional support in the new living environment
·
Confidence
·
Cultural
understanding
·
Knowledge
of the Australian community context
·
Learning
about learning
·
Clarification
of goals
·
Access
and entry into employment, further study, and community life
Objectives
in these domains relate to the personal, social, cultural and political needs
and rights learners.
Jackson
gives the following examples of objectives in on – arrival programs for
immigrants that relate to understanding the context of local service
Institution (1993, 45 ) :
·
To
assist students to identify major local providers of services for :
1.
The
unemployed
2.
Employment
3.
Education
and training
·
To
assist students to identify the main functions of above services in context of
educational provision as a first step in the process of ongoing adult education
·
To
assist students to identify major services. Including private / public
·
To
provide task – oriented activities, including community visits, to familiarize
students with above services
1.
Migrants
2.
Children
3.
Women
4.
Sport
and recreation
·
To
assist students to ascertain relevance of above services for themselves in
terms of
1.
Eligibility
2.
Accessibility
Another
category of outcomes is sometimes referred to as process objectives.
Bruner (1996) and Stenhouse (1975)
associated their ideas as general education.
Bruner
argued that the curriculum should focus less on the outcomes of learning and
more on the knowledge and skills learners need to develop.
Stenhouse
argued that the curriculum should focus on
activities that engage learners in such learners in such processes as
investigation, decision making, reflection, discussion, interpretation, making
choices.
Thus,
Hanley, Whitla, Moss and Walter identified the aims of a course titked “ Man :
A Course of Study” as”:
·
To
initiate and develop in youngster a process of question posing
·
To
teach a research methodology where children can look for information
·
To
help youngster develop the ability to
use a variety of firsthand sources of evidence
·
To
conduct classroom discussions in which youngster learn to listen to others
·
To
legitimize the search, that is, to give sanction and support to open – ended
discussions
·
To
encourage children to reflect on their own experiences
·
To
create a new role for the teacher
Objectives
in the category of learning how to learn refer to learning strategies. This
learning involves :
·
Developing
an integrated set of procedures and operations that can be applied to different
learning
·
Selecting
strategies appropriate to different tasks
·
Monitoring
strategies for their effectiveness
Jackson (
1993, 41 ) gives examples of objectives designed to help different types of
learning strategies. The following
relate to developing strategies :
·
To
explicity introduce students to the concept of time allocation
·
To
assist students to identify realistic times and time spans for home study
·
To
assist students to prioritize study time allocation in relation
·
To
assist students to create a daily / weekly timetable of study
Thinking
Skills
At the end
of the course, pupils should be able to :
·
Explore
an idea, situation or suggested solusion for a specific purpose
·
Think
creatively to generate new ideas
·
Analyse
and / or an idea, a situation or a suggested solution for specific purpose
Learning how to learn
·
Apply a repertoire of library,
information, and study skills
·
Take some responsibility for their
own learning
·
Use some of the basic skills relating
to information technology
Language and Culture
At the end of the course, pupils
should be able to :
·
Appreciate
that there are varieties of English reflecting different cultures and use this
knowledge appropriately and sensitively in communication
·
Adopt
a critical, but not negative, attitude toward ideas, thought, and values
reflected in spoken and written texts of local and foreign origin.
The American Council on the Teaching
of Foreign Language in its National Standard for Foreign Language Learning
(1996) (part of the standards movement referred to earlier) identifies a number
of objectives for language programs that
relate to Philosophy of cultural pluralism. For Example :
·
Students
demonstrate understanding of the concept of culture through comparisons of the
culture studied and their own.
·
Students
acquire information and recognize the
distinctive viewpoints that are only available through the foreign language and
its cultures.
The planning of learning outcomes for
a language course is closely related to the course planning process.
Source : Jack C. Richards, Curriculum
Development in Language Teaching, resume chapter 5.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar